State the decision the scan must support
Describe the planned holes, sawcut, fastening points or broader assessment. Provide drawings showing the intended work and identify known reinforcement, post-tensioning, embedded conduit or other features. Ask the provider which parts of that request it can address and what information another method or professional must supply.
A small scan around several approved penetrations and a detailed survey of an entire slab are different assignments. Define the area and level of detail rather than asking for the cheapest site visit. If the scan is meant to answer a designer’s question, involve that designer in specifying what the report should contain.
Ask about methods and their limits
Ground-penetrating radar is one investigation method; providers may also use other locating tools or complementary methods. The EPA describes GPR as a way to investigate subsurface conditions using reflected electromagnetic energy, with interpretation affected by site conditions. Ask the provider to explain its proposed approach for this concrete element rather than promising that one machine will identify everything.
Discuss access, thickness, reinforcement congestion, surface conditions and the features you need to distinguish. Ask how the report will identify uncertain responses or areas where interpretation is limited. The absence of a marked feature is not the same as a guarantee that the area contains nothing.
Prepare access without concealing useful information
Provide a clear route to the work and tell the provider about floor coverings, equipment, stored materials and areas that cannot be reached. Ask what needs to be moved or exposed and who is responsible for that preparation. If both sides of the element are accessible, share that information without assuming it is always required.
For occupied buildings, coordinate work hours, tenant access and the location of sensitive equipment. Give the provider drawings and previous scan records, but identify whether they reflect the current building. New services or alterations may have occurred since older documents were prepared, so the operator should know their limitations.
Define the marking system
Ask how features and proposed work areas will be marked, what the colors or symbols mean and whether a legend will be supplied. A photograph of lines without an explanation may become difficult to interpret after the crew leaves. Identify any restrictions on marking finished surfaces and whether removable markings or another record is needed.
Have the provider distinguish an observed feature, an interpreted feature, an uncertain response and a proposed clear location. Ask who explains the markings to the cutting or drilling crew. If the work will happen later, plan how the marks are protected or reproduced and when changed conditions require another review.
Keep approval responsibilities separate
Scanning can provide information for a proposed penetration, but approval to cut reinforcement or alter a structural element belongs to the responsible project professional. Ask the contractor and designer who reviews the findings and who authorizes any relocation. A locator should not be assumed to redesign a pipe route or certify the structure simply because it marked a surface.
Record what happens when scanning finds a conflict. The next step may involve moving the proposed hole, changing the installation or investigating further. Keep the revised decision on the drawing, and ensure the drilling crew receives that version rather than an earlier set of marks.
Choose a report that fits the project
A small coring task may need annotated photographs and a clear field sketch; a larger project may require scaled drawings, digital files or a formal report. Ask the receiving engineer or contractor what is necessary before buying a reporting package. Specify the units, reference points and format that make the information usable.
Require the report to identify the surveyed area, method, date, accessible surfaces and limitations. If depths or positions are estimated, ask how uncertainty is communicated. Do not pay for elaborate graphics that omit the practical question of where the team looked and what it could not confidently interpret.
Compare pricing against survey scope
Ask whether pricing is per visit, area, hour, penetration or a defined combination. Identify mobilization, access equipment, reporting, repeat visits and restricted-hour charges. A low price for paint marks may not include the documentation another bidder has priced. Likewise, a comprehensive survey may be unnecessary if the approved task is narrowly defined.
Discuss what happens if access is incomplete or the proposed method cannot answer the question. Ask whether the provider recommends another investigation, charges for further work or delivers a limited report. A useful quote makes these outcomes understandable before the operator is on site.
Hand over findings before cutting or drilling
Arrange for the receiving trade to review the findings and legend, not merely look at the markings. Confirm the approved work locations and any restrictions. If the concrete surface has changed, marks have disappeared or the proposed opening has moved, ask whether the original scan still covers the work.
Keep the report with the final penetration or cutting records. Record actual work performed and deviations approved after scanning. This creates a useful history for future projects and avoids treating an old survey as timeless clearance for unrelated work elsewhere on the slab or at a different depth.
Sources and scope
Official sources support the regulatory and technical points identified below. General comparison advice is editorial guidance. Local examples apply only to their stated jurisdiction; a site assessment determines which conditions apply to your property.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ↗
Explains GPR principles and interpretation limits; general geophysics background, not structural approval.
- Minnesota Department of Transportation ↗
Describes GPR use and limitations in pavement evaluation; not a guarantee of detection in a particular building.